Skip navigationFabian Global Forum - for progressive global politicsHome
RegisterSign in
The global forumThe global 600Global knowledgeEditor's page
Search
Advanced search
Links
About us
Contact us
Send to a friend
 

The global 600

Titus Alexander
Founder and Chair of Charter 99 (www.charter99.org), freelance educator and author of several books, including Unravelling Global Apartheid and Citizenship Schools.

Global inequality is sustained by the west's unequal power to make the rules which govern the world. Poverty has many causes, according to circumstances. Lack of market access is an obstacle for some countries, while too much access and openness to markets is a problem for others. Lack of education, skills, investment, public health or good governance are priorities for some areas, while corruption, conflict, exploitationand systemic injustice need to be tackled first in others. For some countries, western indifference or damaging policies by international agencies are the problem, while in others it is the lack of involvement by the west and international agencies. There is no single solution to all these problems. But the people most closely affected need to have sufficient power to do something.

People can be very creative devising local solutions, but for many of the world's poorest people the major problems are the result of internationalrules, policies and priorities set by and for rich countries. The G7 richest countries have about 12% of world population and three quarters of its wealth. They have the world's most powerful military forces, enabling them to impose their will in much of the world. They also exercise a form of minority rule in the UN Security Council, World Bank, IMF, Bank of International Settlementsand other major institutions of global governance(see my bookUnravelling Global Apartheid,Polity Press, ISBN 0 7456 1352 7). As a result, decisions by these institutions naturally tend to favour western interests. In particular,the world's rules on finance, trade, security, environmental protection and climate change are heavily weighted against the world's poorest people.

To deal with these issues, I propose seven areas for reform:

• International decision-makingmust be transparent and accountable,as advocated by Charter 99 (www.charter99.org) and transparency international (www.transparency.org). Existing structures need to be made open and accountablebeforedeveloping equal representation or direct elections to a world parliament. Formal democratic structures would legitimize an unequal and unjust global system, they would be too remote for most people and could be bought cheaply by the rich and powerful, as in the United States and most large representative democracies. Lack of democratic legitimacy coupled with strong accountabilitywill keep global decision-makerson their toes - and they will be the first to call for directly elected representativesat a global level. But not before they are open and accountable.

• Climate change must be recognized as a global security issue, managed by a robust framework to cut global greenhouse gas emissions to a sustainable level and allocate emission rights on an equal per capita basis (for details of this approach, known as Contraction and Convergence, see www.gci.org.uk).

• Money is the driving force of our unsustainableglobal economy. We need to reform global financial institutions along the lines originally advocated by Keynes, but updated (see Michael Rowbotham,Goodbye America: Globalisation and the Debts of the Developing Nations, Jon Carpenter Publishing, 2000, ISBN: 1897766564).

• The World Trade Organisation (WTO) needs to be more open and equitable; developing countries need the capacity and access to exercise their majority effectively; international trade rules and enforcement need to be even-handed;protectionist measures such as intellectual property rights should be dealt with by the World Intellectual Property Organisation, not the WTO; and there needs to be better linkage with environmental, human rights and security issues. This is a critical but complex area, which should ultimately come under a strengthenedsocial and economic council of the United Nations (see below).

• The veto power of the Permanent Members of the United Nations Security Council must be phased out; developing country representationstrengthened; the capacity for conflict prevention, resolution and policing needs to be boosted, to intervene effectively in cases like the genocide in Rwanda and the prolonged wars in Africa; and the global arms trade needs to be curbed.

• Environmental protectionneeds a 'security council', backed by a world court for the environment.

• The commitmentto halve world poverty needs to be backed by a new and strengthened social and economic council of the United Nations, with equitable representation of the world's people and a direct voice for its poorest people, to oversee the work of international agencies that deal with human rights, welfare and the global economy.

The strategies and tactics most likely to bring about change are

• highly focused global coalitions campaigning on the specific issues above, working through governments, pressure groups and business;
• active education and campaigning within western countries to raise awareness and support for ending global poverty;
• citizenship education in schools to increase understanding and participation in politics as a way of dealing with problems;
• and a deepening of democracy in all areas of life.

Placed on Fabian Global Forum, May 2002

© Fabian Global Forum 2002 | Privacy policy | Top
  Global 600 contents